Players

Rob Brooks Sophomore Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	11	11	11	13	8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	6	13	-.385	1	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	1.5	1.81
2	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	18	.167	2	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.12
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	16	.000	3	1	4	0.33	11	.636	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.67
5	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	11	.091	1	0	3	0.00	6	.500	0	0.00	1	.000	5.0	2.70
7	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	18	.000	7	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.06
8	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	4	6	-.667	2	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	0.5	3.43
10	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	10	.300	8	1	3	0.33	13	.769	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.70
11	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	11	-.182	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.72
13	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	10	.000	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.06
15	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	17	.235	6	1	3	0.25	14	.786	0	0.00	2	.000	8.5	3.38
17	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	8	-.125	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.82
18	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	7	.143	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.70
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	5	.400	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.39
22	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	11	.091	6	0	2	0.00	18	.889	1	0.25	1	1.000	4.5	2.92
25	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	16	-.125	7	1	3	0.33	15	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	3.5	4.23
26	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	5	12	-.083	3	1	2	0.25	10	.800	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.41
29	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	5	22	.045	6	3	3	0.60	15	.800	1	0.20	3	.333	11.5	3.60
33	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	12	.083	7	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.65
36	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	17	.118	8	0	1	0.00	18	.944	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.91
38	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	18	.278	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	5.61
Total		67	75	1.12	66	258	.035	78	8	35	0.12	211	.834	2	0.03	9	.222	104.5	3.84

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	11	1.68	31	8	.742	1.5	1.81
2	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	4	2.20	10	0	1.000	9.0	5.12
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	13	2.04	24	4	.833	6.5	3.67
5	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	2.14	22	1	.955	5.0	2.70
7	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	12	2.14	29	2	.931	6.0	4.06
8	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	6	2.00	14	1	.929	0.5	3.43
10	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	10	3.33	7	2.55	11	0	1.000	4.5	5.70
11	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	4	1.33	16	2.18	28	3	.893	4.5	4.72
13	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	1.86	28	4	.857	3.0	2.06
15	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	8	1.90	20	1	.950	8.5	3.38
17	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	8	2.67	15	2.32	25	2	.920	3.5	4.82
18	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	2	0.67	9	2.31	16	0	1.000	5.0	4.70
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	15	2.07	27	4	.852	3.5	3.39
22	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	15	1.82	38	5	.868	4.5	2.92
25	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	14	2.11	28	4	.857	3.5	4.23
26	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	14	2.06	33	3	.909	6.5	3.41
29	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	7	1.40	16	1.87	39	4	.897	11.5	3.60
33	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.10	20	3	.850	4.0	3.65
36	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	14	2.20	25	1	.960	5.5	3.91
38	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	2.15	20	0	1.000	8.0	5.61
Total		67	1	41	42	3	0.63	86	1.28	229	2.05	488	50	.898	104.5	3.84