Players

Manuel Meurer Junior Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	16	15	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	7	-.143	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.15
8	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.33
10	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	13	.231	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.05
11	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	16	.375	0	0	4	0.00	9	.556	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.84
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	16	.813	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.06
15	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	9	.333	9	1	3	0.33	16	.813	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.69
19	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	11	.273	4	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.20
21	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	12	.333	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.13
25	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	3	21	.667	9	1	6	0.25	20	.700	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.74
26	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	19	2	2	0.67	26	.923	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.07
29	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	16	.688	7	3	3	0.75	16	.813	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.40
30	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	14	.786	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.07
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	19	.263	8	2	1	0.50	17	.941	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.45
35	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	4	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.58
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	14	.643	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.57
40	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	19	.316	3	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.79
44	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	14	.571	7	2	0	0.40	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.58
45	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	20	.500	4	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.86
Total		64	160	2.50	42	245	.482	91	14	33	0.22	237	.861	.	.	.	.	201.0	6.31

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.15
8	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.33
10	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.05
11	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	2	2	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.84
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	2	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.06
15	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.69
19	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.20
21	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	1	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.13
25	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.74
26	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.07
29	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.40
30	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.07
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.45
35	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.58
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.57
40	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.79
44	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	1	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.58
45	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.86
Total		64	9	36	45	9	0.70	21	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	201.0	6.31