Players

Enrique Contreras Junior Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	15	-	-	16	12

Season 17 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
222 2nd	2.20 86th	.933 71st	93 73rd	24 81st

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 17)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	1	0.67	14	.929	7	2.33	8	.875	2.0	8.55
2	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	1	0.00	20	.950	1	0.20	6	.167	0.0	5.93
5	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	3	3	1.00	14	.786	1	0.33	1	1.000	3.0	3.88
6	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	2	0.00	17	.882	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	5.38
7	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	3.48
8	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.25	16	.875	6	1.50	7	.857	1.0	5.84
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	7.25
11	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	1	0.67	12	.917	2	0.67	3	.667	2.0	8.18
14	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	3	0.25	11	.727	5	1.25	6	.833	1.0	7.35
15	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	2	0.67	15	.867	1	0.33	2	.500	2.0	8.62
17	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	8	.625	0.0	7.71
19	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	1.000	0.0	5.79
21	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	3	0.33	12	.750	4	1.33	5	.800	1.0	6.26
22	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	5	2	1.25	17	.882	1	0.25	8	.125	5.0	10.00
23	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	14	.857	5	1.00	8	.625	0.0	8.19
25	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	3.60
26	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	3	0.20	19	.842	6	1.20	7	.857	1.0	4.80
29	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	1	3	0.33	16	.813	2	0.67	2	1.000	1.0	6.26
33	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.33	12	.917	6	2.00	8	.750	1.0	8.89
34	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	4	1.33	4	1.000	0.0	8.33
38	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.25	16	.875	3	0.75	6	.500	1.0	8.87
39	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	4	0.00	13	.692	5	1.25	10	.500	0.0	7.96
43	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	2	0.67	2	1.000	2.0	5.10
44	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	6	0.20	18	.667	6	1.20	7	.857	1.0	5.70
48	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	5.85
Total		90	.	.	.	.	.	112	24	50	0.27	313	.840	93	1.03	138	.674	24.0	6.71

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 17)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	4	2.38	8	0	1.000	2.0	8.55
2	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	27	2.09	54	6	.889	0.0	5.93
5	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	1.53	17	5	.706	3.0	3.88
6	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	12	1.94	33	2	.939	0.0	5.38
7	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	3	1.64	14	2	.857	0.0	3.48
8	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	17	2.32	28	1	.964	1.0	5.84
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	2.50	12	0	1.000	0.0	7.25
11	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	5.33	4	2.00	10	1	.900	2.0	8.18
14	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	10	2.37	19	1	.947	1.0	7.35
15	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	5	2.44	9	0	1.000	2.0	8.62
17	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	10	2.35	17	2	.882	0.0	7.71
19	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	6	1.93	14	2	.857	0.0	5.79
21	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.11	18	2	.889	1.0	6.26
22	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	16	2.89	18	0	1.000	5.0	10.00
23	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	16	2.57	21	1	.952	0.0	8.19
25	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	2.06	18	0	1.000	0.0	3.60
26	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	9	2.19	16	2	.875	1.0	4.80
29	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	5	2.22	9	0	1.000	1.0	6.26
33	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	7	2.29	14	0	1.000	1.0	8.89
34	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	7	2.06	17	0	1.000	0.0	8.33
38	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	9	2.58	12	1	.917	1.0	8.87
39	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	14	2.52	23	0	1.000	0.0	7.96
43	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	4	1.92	12	0	1.000	2.0	5.10
44	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	16	2.21	33	2	.939	1.0	5.70
48	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	14	2.10	29	2	.931	0.0	5.85
Total		90	.	.	.	.	.	222	2.47	242	2.20	475	32	.933	24.0	6.71