Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	21	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.69
2	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	18	.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.52
3	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	9	34	.176	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.11
4	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	3	27	.519	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.25
8	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	18	.167	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.60
9	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	5	23	.217	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.45
11	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	6	16	-.188	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.63
12	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	21	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.29
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	6	14	-.214	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.56
17	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	6	27	.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.54
20	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	13	.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.24
21	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	8	17	-.176	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.00
25	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	18	-.056	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.71
28	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	5	18	-.056	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.80
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	6	25	.080	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.29
33	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	6	28	-.071	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.49
35	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	22	.227	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.76
36	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	21	.048	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.42
37	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	13	.154	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.08
41	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	21	.143	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.07
42	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	20	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.60
Total		80	154	1.93	100	435	.124	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	203.0	4.77

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	NA	NA	18	4	.778	12.0	5.69
2	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	10	3.33	NA	NA	20	0	1.000	6.5	5.52
3	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	8	2.00	NA	NA	27	1	.963	17.0	8.11
4	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	11	2.20	NA	NA	33	3	.909	21.5	7.25
8	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	NA	NA	23	7	.696	8.5	4.60
9	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	7	1.40	NA	NA	27	4	.852	11.0	3.45
11	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	10	2.00	NA	NA	39	4	.897	10.5	4.63
12	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	NA	NA	17	3	.824	11.0	5.29
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	NA	NA	28	3	.893	3.0	2.56
17	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	9	1.80	NA	NA	33	2	.939	14.0	5.54
20	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	NA	NA	18	1	.944	11.0	5.24
21	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	13	2.60	NA	NA	30	2	.933	8.0	5.00
25	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	NA	NA	24	3	.875	3.0	1.71
28	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	6	1.50	NA	NA	27	1	.963	7.0	4.80
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	12	3.00	NA	NA	38	4	.895	9.0	4.29
33	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	NA	NA	36	1	.972	7.0	4.49
35	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	NA	NA	29	7	.759	11.0	4.76
36	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	NA	NA	24	3	.875	7.0	3.42
37	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	NA	NA	22	3	.864	4.5	3.08
41	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	NA	NA	31	2	.935	8.0	5.07
42	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	NA	NA	30	3	.900	12.5	5.60
Total		80	4	48	52	4	0.65	150	1.88	0	0.00	574	61	.894	203.0	4.77