Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	6	32	.219	10	2	1	0.50	20	.950	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.13
2	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	9	48	.208	11	0	4	0.00	21	.810	1	0.20	1	1.000	22.0	8.03
5	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	7	29	.103	7	1	3	0.20	17	.824	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.25
7	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	7	26	.192	2	0	4	0.00	10	.600	2	0.50	2	1.000	13.0	6.94
8	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	14	.143	0	0	2	0.00	4	.500	1	0.33	2	.500	8.0	4.11
9	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	7	32	.156	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.17
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	9	28	.000	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.5	4.96
12	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	23	5.75	8	48	.313	2	2	2	0.50	11	.818	0	0.00	2	.000	27.5	7.47
17	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	7	30	.067	1	1	1	0.33	7	.857	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.03
19	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	7	30	.067	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	1	0.25	1	1.000	11.5	6.15
21	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	8	33	.000	7	2	2	0.40	20	.900	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.43
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	27	.222	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.32
33	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	17	.000	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.10
34	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	18	.444	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.68
36	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	24	.333	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.56
38	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	14	.143	7	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.19
Total		61	170	2.79	95	450	.167	67	9	31	0.15	201	.846	6	0.10	9	.667	197.5	5.60

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	9	2.25	13	2.07	28	3	.893	15.5	7.13
2	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	10	2.00	14	2.00	34	4	.882	22.0	8.03
5	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	9	1.80	11	2.04	25	2	.920	12.0	4.25
7	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	10	2.50	14	2.36	25	1	.960	13.0	6.94
8	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	7	2.29	14	1	.929	8.0	4.11
9	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	7	1.87	23	2	.913	13.0	7.17
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	9	1.69	26	4	.846	9.5	4.96
12	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	10	2.50	10	1.76	29	3	.897	27.5	7.47
17	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	11	2.08	25	3	.880	11.0	6.03
19	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	10	2.50	21	2.30	33	2	.939	11.5	6.15
21	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	18	3.60	16	2.15	34	3	.912	11.0	4.43
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	9	2.25	6	1.52	23	6	.739	11.0	4.32
33	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	8	1.61	23	6	.739	5.0	3.10
34	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	16	2.38	24	3	.875	10.0	6.68
36	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	13	2.14	29	2	.931	11.5	5.56
38	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	10	1.92	25	4	.840	6.0	3.19
Total		61	1	35	36	2	0.59	128	2.10	186	2.01	420	49	.883	197.5	5.60