Players

Timothy Bailey Junior Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	14	-	-	13	8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	8	2.00	10	.800	0.0	6.16
8	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	6	.667	5	1.67	9	.556	0.0	8.26
10	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	2	0.67	4	.500	1.0	3.30
13	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	2	3	0.50	10	.700	2	0.50	8	.250	2.0	5.63
15	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	1	0.00	12	.917	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	8.85
17	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	1	0.00	12	.917	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	7.88
18	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	3	0.00	12	.750	6	2.00	8	.750	0.0	5.94
22	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.25	15	.867	1	0.25	2	.500	1.0	3.68
26	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	3	0.75	4	.750	0.0	6.73
29	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	3	0.00	14	.786	4	1.00	9	.444	0.0	7.76
Total		35	.	.	.	.	.	40	4	20	0.11	113	.823	39	1.11	65	.600	4.0	6.42

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	11	2.50	16	0	1.000	0.0	6.16
8	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	5	2.20	15	0	1.000	0.0	8.26
10	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	1.91	23	2	.913	1.0	3.30
13	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	9	2.54	13	0	1.000	2.0	5.63
15	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.67	9	0	1.000	0.0	8.85
17	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.47	17	0	1.000	0.0	7.88
18	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	2.44	18	0	1.000	0.0	5.94
22	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	9	2.00	22	1	.955	1.0	3.68
26	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	7	2.11	18	1	.944	0.0	6.73
29	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	11	2.32	19	1	.947	0.0	7.76
Total		35	.	.	.	.	.	64	1.83	90	2.27	170	5	.971	4.0	6.42