Players

Marcos Clayton 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	13	14	13	13	4

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	16	.375	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.36
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	19	.158	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.54
6	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	20	.150	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.00
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	9	-.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.96
10	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	15	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.17
12	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	15	-.067	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.95
13	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	7	31	.129	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.86
14	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.88
16	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	5	33	.242	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.53
17	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	8	30	.233	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.39
20	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	14	.071	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.96
23	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	19	.211	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.70
25	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	25	.280	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.89
26	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	14	45	.067	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.56
27	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	6	34	.294	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	9.52
29	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	22	.409	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.23
30	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	19	.211	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.69
33	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	9	.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.53
Total		65	150	2.31	82	384	.177	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	182.0	5.54

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	NA	NA	25	0	1.000	9.5	5.36
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	NA	NA	25	1	.960	7.5	4.54
6	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	10	3.33	NA	NA	12	0	1.000	8.5	7.00
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	NA	NA	21	1	.952	2.0	2.96
10	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	NA	NA	17	1	.941	4.5	3.17
12	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	11	3.67	NA	NA	11	0	1.000	5.5	4.95
13	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	NA	NA	25	0	1.000	11.0	6.86
14	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	NA	NA	14	1	.929	6.5	3.88
16	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	NA	NA	25	3	.880	13.5	4.53
17	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	NA	NA	28	0	1.000	17.0	8.39
20	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	NA	NA	29	2	.931	7.0	4.96
23	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	7	1.75	NA	NA	24	2	.917	10.5	4.70
25	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	NA	NA	16	2	.875	13.0	6.89
26	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	NA	NA	20	0	1.000	18.5	8.56
27	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	11	2.75	NA	NA	25	0	1.000	20.5	9.52
29	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	9	2.25	NA	NA	20	2	.900	12.5	5.23
30	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	NA	NA	18	0	1.000	9.5	4.69
33	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	NA	NA	15	2	.867	5.0	3.53
Total		65	2	40	42	4	0.65	111	1.71	0	0.00	370	17	.954	182.0	5.54