Players

Marcos Clayton 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	13	14	13	13	4

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	15	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.33
5	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	23	.087	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.35
6	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	2	34	.529	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.66
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	24	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.98
8	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	15	.467	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.27
9	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	18	.278	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.06
11	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	9	37	.108	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.72
12	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	1	23	.652	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.96
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	25	.280	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.91
17	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	1	16	.313	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.10
20	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	6	22	.182	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.51
22	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	6	27	.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.97
24	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	22	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.19
28	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	6	26	.038	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.76
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	26	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.89
33	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	3	26	.423	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.56
35	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.02
36	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	12	.417	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.21
37	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	24	.208	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.96
41	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	15	.467	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.44
42	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	17	.647	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.99
Total		78	201	2.58	70	456	.287	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	241.5	5.80

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	NA	NA	18	0	1.000	2.0	3.33
5	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	4	1.33	NA	NA	13	2	.846	7.0	3.35
6	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	NA	NA	29	0	1.000	22.0	8.66
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	NA	NA	17	0	1.000	10.5	6.98
8	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	NA	NA	19	3	.842	11.5	5.27
9	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	NA	NA	26	2	.923	10.0	4.06
11	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	NA	NA	17	1	.941	15.0	5.72
12	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	10	3.33	NA	NA	9	0	1.000	17.5	8.96
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	NA	NA	12	0	1.000	13.0	6.91
17	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	8	1.60	NA	NA	25	1	.960	10.0	5.10
20	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	11	3.67	NA	NA	11	0	1.000	12.5	7.51
22	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	NA	NA	15	2	.867	14.0	5.97
24	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	NA	NA	32	2	.938	6.5	4.19
28	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	5	1.25	NA	NA	25	2	.920	8.5	3.76
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	10	2.50	NA	NA	23	4	.826	18.5	6.89
33	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	10	2.00	NA	NA	22	0	1.000	14.5	6.56
35	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	NA	NA	15	1	.933	4.5	3.02
36	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	NA	NA	22	0	1.000	8.0	6.21
37	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	NA	NA	17	0	1.000	9.0	5.96
41	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	NA	NA	23	1	.957	12.5	5.44
42	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	NA	NA	24	0	1.000	14.5	7.99
Total		78	3	39	42	2	0.54	127	1.63	0	0.00	414	21	.949	241.5	5.80