Players

Mimmo Napolitano Junior Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
10	12	-	-	13	12

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	4	0.50	12	.667	6	1.50	7	.857	2.0	4.41
6	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	7.56
8	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	1	0.33	6	.833	1	0.33	7	.143	1.0	3.50
10	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	7	1.000	0.0	5.09
15	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	0	0.20	15	1.000	5	1.00	9	.556	1.0	6.55
18	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	9	.556	0.0	5.40
21	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	3.85
25	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	6.38
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	1.000	0.0	8.69
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	1.000	0.0	4.66
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	.500	0.0	5.08
34	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	3	.667	0.0	5.70
37	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	6	.833	0.0	5.00
39	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	4	.750	0.0	3.05
42	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	4.40
44	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	3	1.000	0.0	3.95
45	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	4.95
47	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	5	.600	0.0	3.50
Total		68	.	.	.	.	.	8	4	5	0.06	33	.848	71	1.04	106	.670	4.0	5.10

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	17	2.15	27	4	.852	2.0	4.41
6	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	5	2.36	11	0	1.000	0.0	7.56
8	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	2.26	23	2	.913	1.0	3.50
10	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	9	1.84	25	4	.840	0.0	5.09
15	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	14	2.09	32	3	.906	1.0	6.55
18	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	13	2.00	33	4	.879	0.0	5.40
21	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	5	1.67	15	2	.867	0.0	3.85
25	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.44	18	0	1.000	0.0	6.38
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	11	2.56	16	0	1.000	0.0	8.69
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	14	1.97	31	4	.871	0.0	4.66
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.21	24	1	.958	0.0	5.08
34	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	10	2.12	26	0	1.000	0.0	5.70
37	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	13	2.03	30	1	.967	0.0	5.00
39	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	18	2.03	37	3	.919	0.0	3.05
42	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	12	1.93	28	3	.893	0.0	4.40
44	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	26	2.30	50	2	.960	0.0	3.95
45	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.44	16	0	1.000	0.0	4.95
47	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	17	1.95	42	3	.929	0.0	3.50
Total		68	.	.	.	.	.	105	1.54	227	2.11	484	36	.926	4.0	5.10