Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	3	10	-.200	7	1	2	0.20	16	.875	46	9.20	110	.418	6.5	5.61
5	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	8	.250	3	1	1	0.20	12	.917	40	8.00	95	.421	4.0	3.62
6	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	8	.375	4	0	1	0.00	9	.889	31	7.75	92	.337	5.5	4.86
8	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	28	9.33	51	.549	2.5	5.74
10	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	6	.167	5	0	2	0.00	18	.889	42	8.40	115	.365	3.0	4.66
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	7	.143	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	26	8.67	67	.388	1.5	4.00
13	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	7	0	2	0.00	16	.875	42	10.50	105	.400	2.5	6.57
16	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	3	.000	4	1	1	0.25	10	.900	35	8.75	73	.479	3.5	4.80
18	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	33	11.00	84	.393	0.5	5.18
20	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	6	.000	6	2	4	0.40	17	.765	48	9.60	109	.440	3.5	5.12
24	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	9	.000	3	1	3	0.25	13	.769	42	10.50	89	.472	5.0	6.54
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	8	.500	9	0	3	0.00	19	.842	42	10.50	91	.462	6.0	7.72
32	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	6	.000	2	0	2	0.00	6	.667	23	7.67	68	.338	1.0	3.48
34	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	7	1	2	0.33	14	.857	29	9.67	61	.475	4.5	6.03
36	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	5	.200	7	2	1	0.50	16	.938	46	11.50	95	.484	5.0	7.33
43	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	9	-.111	7	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	47	9.40	98	.480	1.0	4.74
Total		64	25	0.39	12	96	.135	78	9	30	0.14	205	.854	600	9.38	1403	.428	55.5	5.38

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	9	9	1	1.80	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.61
5	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.62
6	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.86
8	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.74
10	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.66
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.00
13	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	11	2.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.57
16	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.80
18	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	5.18
20	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	11	2.20	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.12
24	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.54
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.72
32	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.48
34	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.03
36	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.33
43	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.74
Total		64	2	39	41	5	0.64	84	1.31	.	.	.	.	.	55.5	5.38