Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	19	.105	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.99
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	27	.074	1	1	3	0.33	6	.500	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.52
7	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	22	.091	3	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.05
9	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	11	-.182	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.64
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	10	.200	8	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.03
13	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	4	.000	9	1	3	0.25	18	.833	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.17
17	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	15	-.067	4	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.84
19	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	13	.154	7	2	3	0.50	15	.800	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.53
22	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	1	-1.000	2	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.82
Total		31	32	1.03	26	122	.049	40	8	19	0.26	104	.817	.	.	.	.	50.5	4.95

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.99
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.52
7	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.05
9	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.64
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.03
13	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	1	6	7	0	1.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.17
17	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.84
19	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.53
22	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.82
Total		31	3	15	18	2	0.58	35	1.13	.	.	.	.	.	50.5	4.95