Players

Gavin Carter 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	15	-	-	13	12

Season 5 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
193 16th	2.16 96th	.931 92nd	75 76th	17 121st

Career Honors

S42nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	6	2.00	7	.857	1.0	5.81
2	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	3	0.00	10	.700	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	7.39
4	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	3	0.20	18	.833	2	0.40	7	.286	1.0	6.35
5	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	4	0.00	17	.765	6	1.20	7	.857	0.0	6.95
10	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	3	0.50	15	.800	4	1.00	4	1.000	2.0	6.55
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	15	1	2	0.33	20	.900	1	0.33	5	.200	1.0	8.42
13	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	3	0.33	10	.700	6	2.00	4	1.500	1.0	8.74
16	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	1	5	0.20	25	.800	3	0.60	7	.429	1.0	6.63
19	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	0	0.00	5	.000	0.0	7.78
20	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.25	13	.846	3	0.75	6	.500	1.0	7.98
22	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	4.60
23	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	3	1.00	1	3.000	0.0	7.23
25	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	3.85
27	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	0	0.50	15	1.000	2	0.50	4	.500	2.0	5.05
30	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	3	0.20	18	.833	4	0.80	3	1.333	1.0	6.81
32	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	4	1.33	2	2.000	1.0	4.96
35	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.25	13	1.000	2	0.50	9	.222	1.0	7.76
37	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	1	0.67	15	.933	5	1.67	7	.714	2.0	6.46
40	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	2	2.000	0.0	5.26
42	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	0	0.25	15	1.000	3	0.75	4	.750	1.0	4.83
44	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	14	.929	6	1.50	5	1.200	0.0	3.96
45	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.33	7	.714	1	0.33	1	1.000	1.0	6.58
47	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	9	.778	0	0.00	1	.000	0.0	5.83
Total		83	.	.	.	.	.	106	17	39	0.20	297	.869	75	0.90	103	.728	17.0	6.34

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	2.15	13	0	1.000	1.0	5.81
2	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	5	2.10	10	0	1.000	0.0	7.39
4	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	21	2.37	41	0	1.000	1.0	6.35
5	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	13	2.38	24	0	1.000	0.0	6.95
10	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	15	2.31	26	1	.962	2.0	6.55
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	6	2.08	13	1	.923	1.0	8.42
13	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	15	5.00	10	2.17	18	1	.944	1.0	8.74
16	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	10	1.96	24	3	.875	1.0	6.63
19	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	5	2.20	10	0	1.000	0.0	7.78
20	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	18	2.31	29	4	.862	1.0	7.98
22	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	1.78	18	2	.889	0.0	4.60
23	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.41	17	0	1.000	0.0	7.23
25	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	2.14	14	0	1.000	0.0	3.85
27	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	8	2.10	21	1	.952	2.0	5.05
30	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	16	2.06	34	3	.912	1.0	6.81
32	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	2.00	14	1	.929	1.0	4.96
35	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	18	2.14	36	5	.861	1.0	7.76
37	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	11	2.08	24	2	.917	2.0	6.46
40	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	5	1.78	18	2	.889	0.0	5.26
42	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	19	2.24	34	3	.912	1.0	4.83
44	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	11	1.92	25	4	.840	0.0	3.96
45	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.73	11	0	1.000	1.0	6.58
47	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.11	18	1	.944	0.0	5.83
Total		83	.	.	.	.	.	193	2.33	239	2.16	492	34	.931	17.0	6.34