Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	5	1	1	0.25	14	.929	51	12.75	76	.671	3.5	7.90
3	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	42	14.00	79	.532	1.0	8.45
9	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	49	9.80	99	.495	2.0	4.76
10	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	4	.500	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	42	14.00	49	.857	6.0	9.60
12	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	7	.143	7	0	2	0.00	16	.875	63	12.60	98	.643	3.0	8.30
13	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	3	1.000	4	0	1	0.00	8	.875	43	14.33	58	.741	4.0	10.00
14	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	51	12.75	98	.520	2.5	7.71
18	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	5	.000	8	2	3	0.40	19	.842	56	11.20	109	.514	4.5	6.36
19	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	3	0	5	0.00	10	.500	42	14.00	65	.646	1.0	8.61
25	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	46	15.33	62	.742	2.5	8.50
26	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	2	.500	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	59	11.80	95	.621	1.0	5.68
30	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	7	.286	9	5	4	1.00	18	.778	61	12.20	102	.598	8.0	7.51
32	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	33	11.00	63	.524	1.0	4.76
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	7	.143	4	2	2	0.67	10	.800	20	6.67	63	.317	3.5	2.94
Total		54	18	0.33	5	59	.220	57	12	27	0.22	162	.833	658	12.19	1116	.590	43.5	7.22

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	2	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.90
3	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.45
9	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.76
10	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.60
12	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.30
13	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	10.00
14	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.71
18	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.36
19	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.61
25	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.50
26	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.68
30	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.51
32	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.76
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.94
Total		54	0	27	27	5	0.50	45	0.83	.	.	.	.	.	43.5	7.22