Players

Liam Christensen 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	13	13	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	16	.625	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.88
3	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	9	-.111	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.07
4	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	6	.333	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.46
6	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	13	.538	8	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.43
7	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	11	.364	4	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.11
9	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	16	.375	4	1	0	0.20	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.04
10	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.25
12	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	13	.000	9	2	1	0.50	16	.938	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.24
13	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	16	.125	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.86
14	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	11	1	1	0.33	18	.944	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.84
17	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	10	.800	8	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	11.0	10.00
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	6	.167	1	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.80
21	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	18	.278	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.61
22	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	15	.067	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.15
29	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	6	.000	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.70
31	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	6	17	.118	4	2	3	0.40	13	.769	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.73
33	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	13	.538	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.84
36	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	15	.400	8	3	3	0.60	16	.813	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.60
38	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	13	.154	1	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.70
44	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	14	-.071	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.62
46	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	11	.182	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.13
Total		76	135	1.78	61	255	.290	82	11	29	0.14	223	.870	.	.	.	.	185.0	6.10

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.88
3	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.07
4	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	2	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.46
6	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.43
7	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.11
9	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.04
10	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.25
12	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.24
13	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.86
14	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.84
17	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	10.00
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.80
21	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.61
22	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.15
29	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.70
31	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.73
33	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.84
36	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.60
38	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.70
44	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.62
46	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.13
Total		76	4	70	74	5	0.97	33	0.43	.	.	.	.	.	185.0	6.10