Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	14	.286	9	3	1	1.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.81
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	2	-1.000	8	1	1	0.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.05
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.62
11	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	1	-1.000	16	3	5	0.75	24	.792	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.65
14	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	9	.667	6	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.64
15	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	8	.125	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.74
Total		19	16	0.84	6	36	.278	44	8	11	0.42	81	.864	.	.	.	.	39.0	6.59

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.81
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.05
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.62
11	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	2	2	4	1	1.00	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.65
14	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.64
15	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	2	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.74
Total		19	5	20	25	4	1.32	17	0.89	.	.	.	.	.	39.0	6.59