Players

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 09:08:35 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Rob Boston 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	16	17	17	14	7

Season 3 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
176 44th	.230 91st	18 56th	124 55th	30 136th

Career Honors

S43rd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

S52nd All-PAC-8

S61st All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	21	.286	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	0	0.00	3	.000	10.0	6.22
4	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	16	-.125	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.07
5	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	15	.067	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.05
8	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	18	.111	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	1	0.25	1	1.000	6.5	4.16
12	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	9	23	-.043	10	1	0	0.25	20	1.000	2	0.50	1	2.000	10.0	4.42
13	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	8	25	.080	7	1	2	0.25	15	.867	1	0.25	2	.500	12.0	5.30
16	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	21	.381	3	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.22
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	12	.333	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.59
20	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	25	.320	7	0	3	0.00	16	.813	0	0.00	2	.000	13.5	6.28
21	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	6	31	.355	7	0	2	0.00	19	.895	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.54
24	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	9	33	.152	7	3	3	0.75	15	.800	2	0.50	3	.667	18.5	6.56
25	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	8	24	.208	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	15.0	8.10
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	6	39	.256	7	3	2	0.75	16	.875	1	0.25	1	1.000	19.5	6.92
32	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	4	29	.379	2	2	2	0.50	10	.800	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.23
36	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	8	33	.212	6	1	3	0.25	18	.833	0	0.00	2	.000	16.5	7.49
41	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	9	3	2	1.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.64
42	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	20	.500	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	1	0.20	1	1.000	12.5	3.96
Total		62	176	2.84	85	395	.230	88	18	31	0.29	224	.862	9	0.15	17	.529	209.5	5.93

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	14	2.18	28	2	.929	10.0	6.22
4	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	7	2.33	12	1	.917	4.0	5.07
5	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	5	1.67	14	2.07	30	3	.900	6.5	4.05
8	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	10	2.50	17	2.24	29	2	.931	6.5	4.16
12	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	9	1.96	25	1	.960	10.0	4.42
13	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	10	2.50	15	1.89	37	7	.811	12.0	5.30
16	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	20	2.33	33	3	.909	11.5	7.22
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	10	3.33	9	1.89	19	3	.842	8.5	4.59
20	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	9	1.88	25	2	.920	13.5	6.28
21	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	13	3.25	14	2.28	25	2	.920	17.5	8.54
24	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	9	1.92	24	2	.917	18.5	6.56
25	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	17	2.18	28	3	.893	15.0	8.10
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	5	1.25	12	1.97	31	3	.903	19.5	6.92
32	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	12	2.27	22	2	.909	18.5	7.23
36	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	15	2.20	30	1	.967	16.5	7.49
41	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.07	15	2	.867	9.0	4.64
42	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	16	1.88	41	4	.902	12.5	3.96
Total		62	1	29	30	3	0.48	124	2.00	216	2.08	454	43	.905	209.5	5.93