Players

Career Honors

S43rd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

S52nd All-PAC-8

S61st All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	9	.111	5	2	3	0.67	11	.727	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.58
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	15	.800	7	1	4	0.33	13	.692	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.10
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	20	.550	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.79
6	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	20	5.00	3	31	.548	2	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	1	0.25	2	.500	21.5	8.57
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	6	24	.375	10	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	17.0	10.00
9	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	8	32	.281	15	4	2	0.80	27	.926	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.15
11	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	18	.444	11	1	1	0.33	19	.947	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.61
12	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	25	5.00	3	34	.647	2	1	2	0.20	15	.867	.	.	.	.	29.0	7.70
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	23	.261	8	3	0	1.00	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.24
14	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	2	20	.700	10	2	1	0.67	17	.941	.	.	.	.	20.5	10.00
22	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	8	27	.148	6	1	0	0.20	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.73
23	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	22	.455	8	3	1	0.75	19	.947	1	0.25	1	1.000	17.5	7.77
27	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	7	27	.407	10	2	2	0.40	21	.905	0	0.00	1	.000	22.0	8.53
30	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	5	27	.519	4	3	0	0.75	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	22.5	6.08
32	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	5	22	.318	3	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.90
34	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	1	20	.750	7	2	1	0.67	13	.923	.	.	.	.	20.0	9.60
35	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	16	.438	5	2	1	0.67	11	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	15.0	8.44
39	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	12	.333	5	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.45
44	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	6	24	.375	7	2	2	0.50	19	.895	.	.	.	.	20.5	9.24
Total		71	268	3.77	78	423	.449	129	31	24	0.44	300	.920	8	0.11	5	1.600	330.0	7.87

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	3	1.00	7	2.50	14	0	1.000	9.5	5.58
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	8	2.80	10	0	1.000	13.0	9.10
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	3	2.09	11	1	.909	16.0	7.79
6	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	11	2.75	5	2.42	12	0	1.000	21.5	8.57
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	9	3.00	8	2.64	11	0	1.000	17.0	10.00
9	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	14	2.74	19	0	1.000	22.0	8.15
11	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	10	2.62	13	0	1.000	13.0	8.61
12	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	4	0.80	9	2.09	22	2	.909	29.0	7.70
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	7	2.08	12	2	.833	14.5	7.24
14	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	6	2.71	7	0	1.000	20.5	10.00
22	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	11	2.37	19	1	.947	15.0	5.73
23	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	13	2.58	19	0	1.000	17.5	7.77
27	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	10	2.77	13	0	1.000	22.0	8.53
30	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	9	1.78	23	5	.783	22.5	6.08
32	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	17	2.48	25	1	.960	12.0	4.90
34	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	5	2.38	8	0	1.000	20.0	9.60
35	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	4	2.80	5	0	1.000	15.0	8.44
39	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	5	2.18	11	0	1.000	9.5	6.45
44	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	7	1.75	10	2.69	13	0	1.000	20.5	9.24
Total		71	1	60	61	3	0.86	83	1.17	161	2.42	267	12	.955	330.0	7.87