Players

Gabe Kotter 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	17	17	12	-

Career Honors

S41st All-PAC-8

S53rd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

S61st All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	6	1.000	12	3	0	1.00	18	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.40
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.05
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	9	.333	6	2	1	0.67	13	.923	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.05
6	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	13	.538	5	2	3	0.50	17	.824	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.75
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	10	2	2	0.67	18	.889	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.91
9	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	3	22	.545	7	3	2	0.60	21	.905	.	.	.	.	18.5	5.99
11	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	7	.857	4	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.07
12	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	1	11	.727	11	3	1	0.60	25	.960	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.76
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	13	.462	9	2	2	0.67	17	.882	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.39
14	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	6	1.000	7	2	0	0.67	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.40
22	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	2	19	.632	12	2	2	0.40	26	.923	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.54
23	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	14	.429	9	2	1	0.50	22	.955	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.13
27	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	4	17	.471	10	3	2	0.60	21	.905	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.46
30	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	11	.455	3	1	1	0.25	15	.933	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.45
32	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	1	11	.818	10	2	3	0.40	23	.870	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.13
34	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	12	.500	14	4	2	1.33	20	.900	.	.	.	.	15.5	9.63
35	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	7	.857	4	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.07
39	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	6	.333	11	4	2	1.33	17	.882	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.31
44	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	11	.545	9	3	0	0.75	21	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.74
Total		71	159	2.24	35	214	.579	156	42	29	0.59	341	.915	.	.	.	.	235.0	7.38

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.40
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.05
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.05
6	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.75
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.91
9	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	5.99
11	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.07
12	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.76
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.39
14	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.40
22	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.54
23	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.13
27	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.46
30	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.45
32	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.13
34	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	9.63
35	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.07
39	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.31
44	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.74
Total		71	2	64	66	4	0.93	30	0.42	.	.	.	.	.	235.0	7.38