Players

Matthias Winston 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	15	14	11	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
4	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	14	.714	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.34
5	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	12	.083	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.08
8	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	4	11	.182	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.58
9	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	10	.600	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.33
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	8	.375	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.37
12	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	11	.091	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.73
14	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.93
15	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	11	.364	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.05
21	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	13	.538	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.15
23	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	2	17	.706	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.86
25	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	18	.389	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.71
26	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	4	17	.471	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.47
30	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	16	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.05
32	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	12	.750	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.20
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	12	.583	5	4	1	1.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	15.5	9.89
Total		59	129	2.19	35	196	.480	7	4	3	0.07	25	.880	.	.	.	.	169.5	6.55

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
4	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.34
5	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.08
8	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.58
9	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.33
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.37
12	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.73
14	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.93
15	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.05
21	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.15
23	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.86
25	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.71
26	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.47
30	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.05
32	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.20
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	9.89
Total		59	3	67	70	4	1.19	2	0.03	.	.	.	.	.	169.5	6.55