Players

Career Honors

S52nd All-SEC

S63rd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	1	19	.632	6	0	0	0.00	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.76
3	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	18	6.00	4	25	.560	3	0	1	0.00	7	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	20.0	8.05
8	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	13	.615	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.33
9	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	17	5.67	0	21	.810	2	1	2	0.33	9	.778	0	0.00	1	.000	18.0	7.41
10	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	13	.462	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.36
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	0	17	.882	17	1	2	0.33	22	.909	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.05
13	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	3	24	.667	14	2	2	0.50	23	.913	0	0.00	1	.000	22.5	9.60
14	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	25	.480	3	2	2	0.50	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	6.97
17	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	2	25	.600	13	6	0	1.50	24	1.000	0	0.00	2	.000	23.5	7.77
20	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	18	.556	8	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.0	8.33
22	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	20	6.67	4	28	.571	8	1	2	0.33	17	.882	.	.	.	.	23.0	9.71
24	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	1	22	.773	9	2	1	0.50	18	.944	0	0.00	1	.000	22.0	7.90
27	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	32	.406	3	2	0	0.40	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	20.5	5.89
28	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	7	34	.412	4	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.60
29	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	14	.429	4	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.60
32	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	16	.688	4	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.26
34	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	23	5.75	9	37	.378	4	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	23.5	7.97
37	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	21	4.20	2	29	.655	10	1	1	0.20	20	.950	.	.	.	.	22.5	7.25
41	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	31	.419	3	1	2	0.20	13	.846	.	.	.	.	19.5	5.97
Total		71	303	4.27	55	443	.560	124	24	23	0.34	278	.917	10	0.14	9	1.111	349.0	7.73

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	2	0.75	7	1.75	17	2.29	28	1	.964	14.5	7.76
3	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	6	1.93	14	1	.929	20.0	8.05
8	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	10	3.33	12	2.80	15	0	1.000	10.5	8.33
9	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	11	2.33	21	1	.952	18.0	7.41
10	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	11	2.32	19	1	.947	11.0	7.36
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	2	1.50	8	1	.875	16.5	7.05
13	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	13	2.39	18	2	.889	22.5	9.60
14	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	16	2.12	33	5	.848	18.5	6.97
17	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	6	2.15	13	0	1.000	23.5	7.77
20	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	11	2.24	21	1	.952	14.0	8.33
22	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	7	2.40	15	0	1.000	23.0	9.71
24	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	18	2.08	37	5	.865	22.0	7.90
27	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	20	2.13	40	4	.900	20.5	5.89
28	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	22	2.28	43	2	.953	21.5	7.60
29	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	6	2.67	9	0	1.000	12.0	7.60
32	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	7	2.38	13	0	1.000	15.5	8.26
34	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	13	2.16	25	3	.880	23.5	7.97
37	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	26	2.13	47	9	.809	22.5	7.25
41	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	12	2.06	32	2	.938	19.5	5.97
Total		71	1	42	43	3	0.61	79	1.11	236	2.21	451	38	.916	349.0	7.73