Players

Sidney Bullard 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	16	14	6	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	20	.450	2	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.07
3	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	13	.462	12	3	1	0.75	19	.947	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.68
4	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	14	.643	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.73
5	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	5	29	.345	7	3	2	0.60	18	.889	.	.	.	.	22.0	9.59
11	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	17	.353	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.10
12	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	0	10	.800	20	2	4	0.50	30	.867	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.24
13	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	17	.588	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	4.76
14	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	11	.909	9	2	3	0.67	15	.800	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.11
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	16	.438	5	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.84
20	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	12	.583	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.72
21	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	5	23	.261	2	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.09
23	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	11	.727	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.84
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	8	26	.231	9	3	0	0.75	19	1.000	.	.	.	.	21.0	10.00
27	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	1	14	.714	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.71
29	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	12	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.16
32	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	7	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.05
34	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.76
37	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	7	24	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	5.20
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	12	.750	3	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.36
Total		73	197	2.70	52	299	.485	71	14	19	0.19	158	.880	.	.	.	.	246.5	6.74

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	2	4	6	1	1.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.07
3	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	2	2	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.68
4	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.73
5	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	2	1.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	9.59
11	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.10
12	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.24
13	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	4.76
14	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.11
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.84
20	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.72
21	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.09
23	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.84
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	3	2.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	10.00
27	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.71
29	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.16
32	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.05
34	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.76
37	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	1	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	5.20
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.36
Total		73	6	59	65	10	0.89	14	0.19	.	.	.	.	.	246.5	6.74