Players

Fernando Marquez 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	14	15	15	14	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	14	.000	9	1	3	0.25	17	.824	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	5.12
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	10	-.100	2	1	3	0.33	7	.571	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.05
6	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	6	21	.190	6	3	3	0.75	15	.800	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.15
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	17	.353	7	1	1	0.20	19	.947	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.81
8	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	13	.769	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.18
9	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	6	21	.048	3	0	5	0.00	15	.667	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.26
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	16	.313	11	3	3	1.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.33
15	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	6	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.88
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	15	.533	9	1	2	0.33	15	.867	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	7.93
19	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	1	21	.714	8	2	5	0.50	21	.762	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	7.12
20	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	1	23	.565	15	2	2	0.50	26	.923	1	0.25	1	1.000	19.0	8.18
22	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	13	.769	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.32
24	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	10	.600	7	2	1	0.67	14	.929	1	0.33	1	1.000	11.0	5.53
26	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	1	20	.750	9	2	5	0.40	24	.792	0	0.00	2	.000	18.5	6.92
28	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	0	17	.765	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.54
30	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	6	30	.433	4	1	2	0.25	16	.875	.	.	.	.	23.0	8.96
34	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	22	.273	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.79
38	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	18	.556	3	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.93
41	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	19	.632	3	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.66
Total		67	193	2.88	45	329	.450	118	20	47	0.30	284	.835	10	0.15	7	1.429	234.0	6.35

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	11	2.75	16	2.29	28	3	.893	7.0	5.12
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	4	1.33	10	2.60	15	0	1.000	4.5	5.05
6	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	13	1.86	36	4	.889	13.0	4.15
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	19	2.30	30	3	.900	10.0	4.81
8	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	13	2.17	24	4	.833	11.0	7.18
9	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	10	2.00	26	2	.923	7.5	3.26
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	9	2.40	15	1	.933	12.5	7.33
15	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	6	2.00	5	1.81	16	1	.938	6.0	3.88
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	12	2.29	21	1	.952	11.5	7.93
19	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	18	2.05	38	6	.842	18.5	7.12
20	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	8	2.00	11	2.08	26	3	.885	19.0	8.18
22	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	6	1.94	17	1	.941	10.0	6.32
24	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	7	1.94	18	2	.889	11.0	5.53
26	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	20	2.28	32	3	.906	18.5	6.92
28	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	14	2.36	22	2	.909	15.0	8.54
30	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	8	2.00	16	2.33	27	0	1.000	23.0	8.96
34	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	12	2.15	26	1	.962	9.5	5.79
38	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	2	2.00	5	1	.800	14.0	7.93
41	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	3	2.00	17	0	1.000	12.5	6.66
Total		67	2	38	40	1	0.60	110	1.64	216	2.15	439	38	.913	234.0	6.35