Players

Fernando Marquez 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	14	15	15	14	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	0	19	.789	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	0	0.00	1	.000	15.5	8.94
3	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	15	.400	7	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.29
4	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	18	.333	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.81
5	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	18	.500	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.85
7	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	16	.438	9	1	3	0.33	17	.824	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.80
8	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	16	.438	7	1	3	0.33	13	.769	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.92
10	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	20	.350	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.75
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	19	.526	4	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.50
15	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	8	29	.310	2	1	3	0.20	16	.813	.	.	.	.	21.5	6.65
16	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	4	27	.407	3	1	2	0.25	11	.818	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.76
23	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	8	.625	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.11
24	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	20	.700	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.23
27	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	23	.522	8	0	2	0.00	17	.882	2	0.40	1	2.000	18.0	6.12
28	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	27	5.40	11	45	.356	5	1	4	0.20	16	.750	2	0.40	1	2.000	29.5	8.24
30	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	6	26	.423	9	2	1	0.40	19	.947	.	.	.	.	21.5	6.63
32	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	6	22	.182	6	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.12
34	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	18	.444	14	5	2	1.67	22	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	18.0	8.96
35	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	0	13	.923	8	2	2	0.50	19	.895	3	0.75	2	1.500	15.0	7.40
Total		66	231	3.50	62	372	.454	102	17	39	0.26	248	.843	13	0.20	6	2.167	280.5	7.45

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	19	2.50	28	2	.929	15.5	8.94
3	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	11	2.53	15	1	.933	9.5	7.29
4	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	8	2.09	22	2	.909	14.0	7.81
5	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	8	2.50	14	0	1.000	12.5	7.85
7	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	6	2.15	13	2	.846	11.0	6.80
8	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	6	2.00	15	2.83	18	0	1.000	13.5	8.92
10	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	6	2.23	13	0	1.000	13.0	7.75
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	6	2.00	4	2.23	13	0	1.000	13.5	8.50
15	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	3	0.60	16	2.21	34	1	.971	21.5	6.65
16	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	15	2.28	29	2	.931	18.5	7.76
23	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	6	2.50	10	0	1.000	6.5	5.11
24	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	3	0.75	10	2.17	23	1	.957	17.0	7.23
27	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	12	1.91	32	3	.906	18.0	6.12
28	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	20	2.23	40	1	.975	29.5	8.24
30	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	3	0.60	8	2.00	21	2	.905	21.5	6.63
32	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	23	2.38	40	1	.975	12.5	6.12
34	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	5	2.38	8	0	1.000	18.0	8.96
35	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	17	2.48	25	0	1.000	15.0	7.40
Total		66	3	59	62	4	0.94	75	1.14	209	2.29	398	18	.955	280.5	7.45