Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	21	.429	5	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.21
4	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	13	.538	13	1	3	0.25	22	.864	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.17
6	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	7	30	.300	4	2	4	0.50	14	.714	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.47
7	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	4	.500	8	0	3	0.00	20	.850	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.73
9	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	13	3	2	1.00	19	.895	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.47
10	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	9	.667	7	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	9.0	9.15
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	6	.667	9	3	2	1.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.19
13	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	2	15	.333	3	1	3	0.20	15	.800	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.08
15	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	4	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.12
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	9	-.333	15	2	1	0.67	20	.950	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.75
23	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	13	.462	1	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.28
26	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	2	5	-.200	15	0	1	0.00	24	.958	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.05
27	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	12	.333	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.62
29	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	2	10	.200	5	2	1	0.40	18	.944	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.42
30	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	15	.067	17	0	2	0.00	26	.923	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.36
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	5	.200	1	1	3	0.33	7	.571	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.44
37	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	13	.077	5	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.07
39	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	1	14	.643	12	2	3	0.40	22	.864	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.16
40	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	4	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.92
44	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	13	.154	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.66
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	6	26	.231	9	2	3	0.40	18	.833	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.06
Total		83	121	1.46	47	245	.302	153	23	39	0.28	330	.882	.	.	.	.	175.0	6.30

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.21
4	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.17
6	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.47
7	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.73
9	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.47
10	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	9.15
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.19
13	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.08
15	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.12
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.75
23	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.28
26	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.05
27	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.62
29	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.42
30	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.36
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.44
37	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.07
39	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.16
40	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.92
44	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.66
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.06
Total		83	0	62	62	2	0.75	93	1.12	.	.	.	.	.	175.0	6.30