Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	2	2	1	0.67	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.64
3	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	1	11	.273	18	4	1	0.80	28	.964	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.49
4	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	7	.714	9	3	1	1.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.90
5	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	7	34	.382	10	1	2	0.20	20	.900	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.10
8	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	19	.158	7	3	2	0.60	17	.882	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.28
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	13	-.077	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.13
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	15	5.00	5	24	.417	3	2	4	0.67	11	.636	.	.	.	.	17.0	5.76
16	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	8	14	-.214	6	1	1	0.25	17	.941	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.13
17	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	5	25	.320	4	2	2	0.50	13	.846	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.86
19	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	19	.211	7	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	10.5	9.35
23	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	18	.333	5	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.08
33	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	7	.429	6	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.61
34	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	17	.235	4	1	1	0.20	13	.923	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.52
35	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	13	.538	7	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.78
39	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	10	.600	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.56
40	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	11	.364	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.36
44	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	19	.211	4	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.32
45	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	12	.583	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.20
Total		67	137	2.04	50	282	.309	105	24	30	0.36	247	.879	.	.	.	.	194.0	6.62

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.64
3	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.49
4	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.90
5	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	2	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.10
8	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.28
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.13
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	5.76
16	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.13
17	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.86
19	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	9.35
23	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.08
33	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.61
34	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	2	5	7	1	1.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.52
35	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.78
39	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	9	9	1	3.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.56
40	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.36
44	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	2	2	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.32
45	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.20
Total		67	8	50	58	11	0.87	67	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	194.0	6.62