Players

Cash Osborn 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
18	14	16	15	13	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	17	.294	4	2	0	0.40	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.71
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	20	.100	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.40
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	12	.000	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	2.5	1.69
10	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	15	.267	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.40
12	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	18	.333	3	2	3	0.50	12	.750	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.36
15	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	8	25	-.160	9	4	3	1.00	17	.824	0	0.00	2	.000	8.0	3.20
17	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	9	.222	6	1	1	0.33	14	.929	1	0.33	1	1.000	4.5	2.89
19	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	15	.200	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.86
21	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	7	35	.286	7	1	1	0.25	15	.933	1	0.25	1	1.000	22.5	8.95
22	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	9	21	-.238	6	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.88
24	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	20	.150	4	0	1	0.00	14	.929	1	0.25	1	1.000	8.0	4.26
25	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	26	.308	6	0	1	0.00	16	.938	1	0.25	1	1.000	13.0	5.65
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	6	18	-.167	11	3	3	0.75	22	.864	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	5.09
33	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	9	29	.069	8	1	3	0.20	21	.857	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.25
35	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	7	17	-.176	10	3	3	0.75	19	.842	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.61
36	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	17	.412	8	2	3	0.40	17	.824	1	0.20	1	1.000	13.5	4.41
38	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	6	23	.087	7	0	1	0.00	13	.923	1	0.33	1	1.000	8.5	6.17
41	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	5	19	.158	4	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.21
43	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	8	19	-.053	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.81
Total		71	134	1.89	93	375	.109	99	21	31	0.30	254	.878	11	0.15	10	1.100	182.5	4.57

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	11	2.20	16	2.30	27	2	.926	12.5	4.71
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	7	2.06	18	1	.944	7.5	4.40
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	2	0.67	10	1.71	34	6	.824	2.5	1.69
10	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	7	1.89	19	3	.842	8.0	3.40
12	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	16	1.97	34	4	.882	10.0	3.36
15	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	13	1.96	28	4	.857	8.0	3.20
17	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	8	1.74	27	4	.852	4.5	2.89
19	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	16	2.16	32	3	.906	8.5	4.86
21	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	9	9	0	2.25	7	1.75	17	2.21	33	2	.939	22.5	8.95
22	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	6	2.00	15	2	.867	6.0	3.88
24	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	14	2.16	25	4	.840	8.0	4.26
25	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	15	1.82	34	8	.765	13.0	5.65
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	5	1.25	17	2.17	30	4	.867	9.0	5.09
33	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	9	1.80	16	2.03	38	2	.947	16.0	5.25
35	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	6	1.50	8	2.29	17	0	1.000	7.5	4.61
36	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	18	2.15	33	4	.879	13.5	4.41
38	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	14	2.27	26	0	1.000	8.5	6.17
41	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	14	2.46	24	1	.958	8.0	4.21
43	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	10	2.33	15	0	1.000	9.0	5.81
Total		71	3	49	52	5	0.73	92	1.30	242	2.07	509	54	.894	182.5	4.57