Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	2.60
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	1	0.33	7	.143	2.0	7.67
8	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	7.63
11	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	3	0.67	11	.727	1	0.33	6	.167	2.0	7.39
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	7	.857	1	0.33	6	.167	1.0	5.45
15	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	1	2	0.25	16	.875	1	0.25	5	.200	1.0	6.73
19	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	5	0.20	14	.643	4	0.80	4	1.000	1.0	6.05
20	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	4	0.25	16	.750	5	1.25	3	1.667	1.0	6.23
22	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	6	.333	0.0	2.95
31	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	4	0.33	12	.667	3	1.00	2	1.500	1.0	5.20
33	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	3	0.25	18	.833	6	1.50	7	.857	1.0	8.25
36	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	2	2	0.67	19	.895	2	0.67	4	.500	2.0	5.36
38	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	5	1.67	8	.625	0.0	6.23
41	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2	1	0.50	23	.957	2	0.50	3	.667	2.0	6.18
43	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	9	.889	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	5.93
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	0	0.20	20	1.000	4	0.80	5	.800	1.0	7.23
46	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	3	0.00	20	.850	6	1.20	6	1.000	0.0	5.80
48	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	11	.909	3	0.75	2	1.500	0.0	4.90
Total		68	.	.	.	.	.	80	15	35	0.22	232	.849	54	0.79	89	.607	15.0	5.99

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	1.79	14	3	.786	0.0	2.60
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	2.58	12	0	1.000	2.0	7.67
8	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	8	2.14	14	0	1.000	0.0	7.63
11	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.33	18	0	1.000	2.0	7.39
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	2.08	12	0	1.000	1.0	5.45
15	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	10	2.29	21	1	.952	1.0	6.73
19	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	13	2.10	29	2	.931	1.0	6.05
20	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	19	2.22	32	3	.906	1.0	6.23
22	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	15	1.79	38	7	.816	0.0	2.95
31	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	2.43	14	0	1.000	1.0	5.20
33	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	8	2.19	21	0	1.000	1.0	8.25
36	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	5	1.94	16	0	1.000	2.0	5.36
38	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	5	2.08	12	0	1.000	0.0	6.23
41	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	14	2.17	29	3	.897	2.0	6.18
43	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.27	11	1	.909	0.0	5.93
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	17	2.40	30	1	.967	1.0	7.23
46	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	16	2.27	30	2	.933	0.0	5.80
48	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	9	1.79	29	2	.931	0.0	4.90
Total		68	.	.	.	.	.	144	2.12	180	2.14	382	25	.935	15.0	5.99