Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	0	0.20	17	1.000	4	0.80	6	.667	1.0	7.28
3	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	5	1.25	8	.625	0.0	6.05
4	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	6	0.00	18	.667	5	1.00	6	.833	0.0	4.80
5	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	3	0.25	12	.750	4	1.00	9	.444	1.0	6.90
7	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	6	5	1.20	22	.773	6	1.20	8	.750	6.0	7.93
8	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	5	.600	5	1.67	5	1.000	0.0	8.23
11	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	14	.786	2	0.50	2	1.000	0.0	9.99
12	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	3	0.75	7	.429	0.0	7.48
13	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	3.97
14	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3	2	1.00	16	.875	2	0.67	4	.500	3.0	6.26
19	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	0	0	0.00	20	1.000	4	1.00	9	.444	0.0	8.24
22	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	2	0.00	16	.875	4	1.00	13	.308	0.0	5.33
23	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	2	0.67	10	.800	2	0.67	3	.667	2.0	5.10
31	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	4	0.25	13	.692	6	1.50	8	.750	1.0	5.21
33	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	2	0.33	14	.857	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	8.81
36	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	4	1.33	9	.444	0.0	6.18
38	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	3	0.75	16	.813	8	2.00	16	.500	3.0	6.39
41	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	4	0.60	19	.789	2	0.40	4	.500	3.0	5.08
43	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.25	11	.818	2	0.50	4	.500	1.0	6.98
46	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	2	0.67	5	.400	1.0	8.38
48	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	3	1.00	4	.750	1.0	4.88
Total		80	.	.	.	.	.	116	24	47	0.30	296	.841	79	0.99	140	.564	24.0	6.64

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	15	2.24	29	2	.931	1.0	7.28
3	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	9	2.27	15	0	1.000	0.0	6.05
4	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	7	2.06	18	0	1.000	0.0	4.80
5	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	12	2.32	19	2	.895	1.0	6.90
7	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	17	2.46	26	1	.962	6.0	7.93
8	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	2.62	13	0	1.000	0.0	8.23
11	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	13	2.63	19	0	1.000	0.0	9.99
12	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	8	2.38	13	0	1.000	0.0	7.48
13	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	2.29	21	1	.952	0.0	3.97
14	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	2.19	16	1	.938	3.0	6.26
19	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	11	2.24	21	2	.905	0.0	8.24
22	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	16	2.20	30	2	.933	0.0	5.33
23	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	13	2.26	23	2	.913	2.0	5.10
31	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	18	2.25	36	2	.944	1.0	5.21
33	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	13	2.75	16	0	1.000	1.0	8.81
36	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	5	2.18	11	1	.909	0.0	6.18
38	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	15	2.07	28	2	.929	3.0	6.39
41	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	18	2.22	36	3	.917	3.0	5.08
43	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	2.39	23	1	.957	1.0	6.98
46	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	16	2.62	21	0	1.000	1.0	8.38
48	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.04	25	3	.880	1.0	4.88
Total		80	.	.	.	.	.	164	2.05	257	2.30	459	25	.946	24.0	6.64