Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	2	0.67	10	.800	2	0.67	4	.500	2.0	5.46
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	1	3	0.33	17	.824	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	5.26
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.33	13	.846	1	0.33	8	.125	1.0	5.15
6	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2	2	0.50	20	.900	2	0.50	5	.400	2.0	4.36
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	0	0.00	9	.000	1.0	8.18
9	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1	4	0.20	20	.800	2	0.40	10	.200	1.0	6.48
11	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	2	0.67	8	.250	1.0	7.88
12	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	19	.842	4	0.80	6	.667	0.0	3.85
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	0	0.00	6	.000	0.0	6.43
14	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.33	10	.800	2	0.67	6	.333	1.0	5.93
17	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	2	0.67	7	.286	1.0	6.81
18	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	6	1.50	19	.316	0.0	8.02
22	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	4	0.20	14	.714	4	0.80	12	.333	1.0	6.45
23	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	12	.917	3	0.75	5	.600	0.0	5.05
27	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	14	.857	5	1.00	8	.625	0.0	3.85
30	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	4	0.00	16	.750	2	0.50	12	.167	0.0	4.48
32	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	5	0.00	17	.706	3	0.60	11	.273	0.0	6.50
34	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	7	2.33	6	1.167	0.0	7.49
35	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	1	0.33	6	.167	1.0	10.00
39	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	1	2	0.33	15	.867	0	0.00	6	.000	1.0	5.99
44	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.25	13	.846	4	1.00	6	.667	1.0	6.00
Total		78	.	.	.	.	.	113	15	50	0.19	281	.822	55	0.71	165	.333	15.0	6.17

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	3	1.77	13	1	.923	2.0	5.46
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	1	1.60	5	0	1.000	1.0	5.26
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	2.20	10	1	.900	1.0	5.15
6	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	10	2.26	19	1	.947	2.0	4.36
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	15	2.64	22	0	1.000	1.0	8.18
9	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	21	2.38	37	0	1.000	1.0	6.48
11	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	5	2.22	9	0	1.000	1.0	7.88
12	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	17	2.08	40	4	.900	0.0	3.85
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	2.35	20	0	1.000	0.0	6.43
14	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	5	1.80	15	1	.933	1.0	5.93
17	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	5	2.08	13	1	.923	1.0	6.81
18	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	11	2.39	18	0	1.000	0.0	8.02
22	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	20	2.31	36	2	.944	1.0	6.45
23	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	16	2.22	27	1	.963	0.0	5.05
27	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	17	2.18	34	2	.941	0.0	3.85
30	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	12	2.33	24	1	.958	0.0	4.48
32	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	12	2.15	27	2	.926	0.0	6.50
34	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	8	2.09	23	0	1.000	0.0	7.49
35	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	9	2.90	10	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
39	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	4	2.09	11	1	.909	1.0	5.99
44	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	20	2.17	35	4	.886	1.0	6.00
Total		78	.	.	.	.	.	156	2.00	227	2.22	448	22	.951	15.0	6.17