Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	6.30
2	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	8	.125	0.0	7.68
7	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	.444	0.0	7.95
8	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	5.93
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	2	1.000	0.0	4.18
12	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	5	.600	0.0	5.35
13	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	5.65
14	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	7	.714	0.0	6.30
17	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	6.78
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	10	1.000	0.0	6.71
22	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	4	0.00	13	.692	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	8.98
23	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	9	.778	6	2.00	7	.857	0.0	7.97
26	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	3.15
27	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	3.85
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	6.98
32	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	1.000	0.0	6.01
34	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	6.98
37	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	4.95
39	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	7.43
42	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	5.30
44	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	5.45
47	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	2.70
Total		71	.	.	.	.	.	9	0	6	0.00	22	.727	75	1.06	121	.620	0.0	6.03

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	6	1.80	15	4	.733	0.0	6.30
2	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	13	2.37	19	2	.895	0.0	7.68
7	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	2.70	10	0	1.000	0.0	7.95
8	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	14	2.17	23	2	.913	0.0	5.93
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.35	17	0	1.000	0.0	4.18
12	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	21	2.14	44	3	.932	0.0	5.35
13	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	2.11	18	0	1.000	0.0	5.65
14	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	23	2.30	44	0	1.000	0.0	6.30
17	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	6	2.13	15	0	1.000	0.0	6.78
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	5	2.00	10	1	.900	0.0	6.71
22	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	18	2.43	30	1	.967	0.0	8.98
23	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	5	2.30	10	0	1.000	0.0	7.97
26	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	1.95	21	3	.857	0.0	3.15
27	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	16	2.16	31	4	.871	0.0	3.85
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.41	17	0	1.000	0.0	6.98
32	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.38	13	0	1.000	0.0	6.01
34	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	6	2.27	11	1	.909	0.0	6.98
37	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.29	21	1	.952	0.0	4.95
39	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	11	2.47	17	0	1.000	0.0	7.43
42	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	4	2.00	13	0	1.000	0.0	5.30
44	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	14	2.21	29	1	.966	0.0	5.45
47	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	1.85	13	0	1.000	0.0	2.70
Total		71	.	.	.	.	.	147	2.07	228	2.22	441	23	.948	0.0	6.03