Players

Ryder Melendez 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	15	16	15	-

Season 8 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
106 203rd	.456 69th	26 50th	85 113th	59 88th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	5	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.33
3	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	8	.375	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.63
4	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	16	4	2	1.33	20	.900	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.48
6	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	7	.286	6	3	1	0.75	15	.933	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.47
8	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	8	.500	12	2	2	0.40	23	.913	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.66
9	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	15	.267	6	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.06
10	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	10	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.71
12	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	6	.833	6	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.26
14	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	6	2	3	0.67	11	.727	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.33
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	18	.333	6	1	3	0.20	16	.813	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.50
19	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	7	.714	5	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.27
20	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	3	8	.000	1	0	5	0.00	12	.583	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.80
21	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	7	.571	11	1	3	0.25	20	.850	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.85
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	5	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.20
25	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	10	.500	10	1	2	0.33	16	.875	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.32
26	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	6	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.95
30	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	12	.417	7	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.56
32	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	7	.429	7	2	2	0.50	17	.882	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.10
35	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	8	.500	7	0	0	0.00	18	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.60
37	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	8	.625	8	2	2	0.50	17	.882	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.62
39	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.20
40	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	7	.857	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.38
44	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	9	.333	9	2	1	0.50	18	.944	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.94
45	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	7	.571	4	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.98
Total		87	106	1.22	24	180	.456	161	26	41	0.30	346	.882	.	.	.	.	165.0	5.72

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.33
3	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.63
4	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.48
6	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.47
8	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.66
9	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.06
10	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.71
12	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.26
14	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.33
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.50
19	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.27
20	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.80
21	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.85
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.20
25	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.32
26	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.95
30	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.56
32	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.10
35	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.60
37	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.62
39	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.20
40	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.38
44	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	2	1.25	10	2.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.94
45	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.98
Total		87	7	52	59	10	0.68	85	0.98	.	.	.	.	.	165.0	5.72