Players

Tobias Fernandez 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	16	14	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	11	.182	3	2	1	0.67	9	.889	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.35
5	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	11	.091	6	1	3	0.33	14	.786	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.84
7	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	18	.444	4	2	3	0.50	13	.769	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.22
8	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	8	.375	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.44
9	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	11	-.091	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.04
11	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	8	.375	2	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.74
12	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	8	.375	5	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.48
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	13	.154	4	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.11
15	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	11	.545	9	1	3	0.25	17	.824	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.26
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	11	.364	6	1	5	0.25	16	.688	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.32
18	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	8	22	.091	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.53
21	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	15	.467	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.49
22	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.81
31	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	11	.182	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.36
34	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	15	.533	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.39
39	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	10	.200	8	3	2	1.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.78
Total		52	103	1.98	48	192	.286	64	13	28	0.25	167	.832	.	.	.	.	139.0	6.01

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.35
5	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.84
7	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.22
8	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.44
9	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.04
11	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.74
12	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.48
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.11
15	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.26
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.32
18	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.53
21	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.49
22	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.81
31	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.36
34	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.39
39	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.78
Total		52	2	42	44	4	0.85	14	0.27	.	.	.	.	.	139.0	6.01