Players

Anderson Mack 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	14	18	9	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	10	.200	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.47
3	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	13	.462	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.53
5	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	14	.429	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.89
6	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	7	.714	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
8	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	7	.143	5	2	2	0.67	9	.778	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.17
9	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	15	.600	4	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.92
11	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	15	.400	8	2	2	0.67	13	.846	.	.	.	.	15.5	10.00
12	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.92
13	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	14	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
16	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	6	21	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.28
18	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	7	2	1	0.67	10	.900	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.32
19	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	5	21	.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.46
21	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	0	10	.800	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.36
22	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	13	.385	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.16
25	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	20	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.58
26	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	1	12	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.11
30	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	15	.533	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.80
32	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	23	.565	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.55
40	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	12	.417	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.76
45	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	2	17	.647	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.24
Total		77	195	2.53	59	277	.491	34	7	12	0.09	90	.867	.	.	.	.	236.0	6.25

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.47
3	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.53
5	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.89
6	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
8	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.17
9	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.92
11	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	1	2.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	10.00
12	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.92
13	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
16	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.28
18	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.32
19	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.46
21	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.36
22	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.16
25	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.58
26	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	1	5	6	1	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.11
30	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.80
32	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.55
40	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.76
45	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.24
Total		77	2	64	66	8	0.86	14	0.18	.	.	.	.	.	236.0	6.25