Players

Johnathan Crosby 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	-	14	14	12	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	7	.286	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.59
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	7	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.27
4	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	4	.500	9	1	2	0.20	20	.900	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.50
6	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	12	.667	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.48
7	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	5	.400	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.71
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	27	.259	6	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	16.5	9.01
10	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	0	8	.625	11	3	4	0.60	24	.833	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.39
12	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	3	5	-.600	6	4	6	1.00	17	.647	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.19
13	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	1	1.000	3	1	4	0.25	13	.692	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.90
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	7	.143	7	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.17
17	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	8	.375	7	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.38
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	6	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.00
21	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.54
22	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.98
25	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	0	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.65
29	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	6	1.000	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.83
33	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	3	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.92
34	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	9	.000	1	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	4.0	1.86
39	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.64
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	9	.778	3	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.60
Total		69	76	1.10	22	143	.378	91	17	37	0.25	256	.855	.	.	.	.	118.0	5.28

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.59
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.27
4	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.50
6	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.48
7	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.71
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	9.01
10	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.39
12	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.19
13	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.90
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.17
17	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.38
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.00
21	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.54
22	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.98
25	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.65
29	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.83
33	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.92
34	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	1.86
39	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.64
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.60
Total		69	3	44	47	3	0.68	82	1.19	.	.	.	.	.	118.0	5.28