Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	2	0.67	5	.400	1.0	6.00
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	1	0.00	13	.923	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	5.62
9	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	3	0.40	16	.813	4	0.80	11	.364	2.0	7.28
10	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	3.15
14	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	1.90
15	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	4	0.00	10	.600	3	1.00	9	.333	0.0	4.63
17	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	1.10
18	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	17	.176	0.0	7.83
21	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.20	14	.929	7	1.40	18	.389	1.0	5.23
22	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	1.85
29	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	2	0.40	6	.333	0.0	4.90
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	32	4	17	0.10	98	.827	28	0.70	89	.315	4.0	4.50

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	8	1.74	27	2	.926	1.0	6.00
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	1.88	24	3	.875	0.0	5.62
9	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	3.20	13	2.06	32	2	.938	2.0	7.28
10	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	14	2.06	31	3	.903	0.0	3.15
14	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	1.93	27	4	.852	0.0	1.90
15	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.00	18	1	.944	0.0	4.63
17	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	7	1.68	25	3	.880	0.0	1.10
18	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	9	2.10	20	0	1.000	0.0	7.83
21	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	11	2.00	29	2	.931	1.0	5.23
22	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	1.80	30	7	.767	0.0	1.85
29	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	20	2.05	41	6	.854	0.0	4.90
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	88	2.20	121	1.94	304	33	.891	4.0	4.50