Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	5	19	-.211	9	1	1	0.25	18	.944	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.55
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	14	.214	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.20
17	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	29	.310	6	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.80
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	29	.414	7	1	3	0.33	14	.786	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.75
21	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	19	.158	6	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.09
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	11	.182	6	2	2	0.67	13	.846	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.27
30	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	15	.067	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.86
35	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	8	31	.000	7	0	1	0.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.86
40	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	9	24	-.250	4	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.00
Total		33	55	1.67	35	191	.105	49	6	15	0.18	121	.876	.	.	.	.	71.5	5.82

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.55
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.20
17	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	10	2.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.80
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.75
21	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.09
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.27
30	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.86
35	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.86
40	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.00
Total		33	1	19	20	0	0.61	37	1.12	.	.	.	.	.	71.5	5.82