Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	2	0.50	5	.400	0.0	7.20
4	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	6	1.20	9	.667	0.0	6.10
9	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	2	0.00	15	.867	5	1.25	13	.385	0.0	7.71
12	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	4	1.33	9	.444	2.0	6.41
15	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	5.43
17	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	5.43
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	5	1.00	8	.625	0.0	4.48
25	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	11	.909	6	1.20	9	.667	0.0	4.50
26	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.25	10	.900	5	1.25	7	.714	1.0	6.05
29	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	2.95
46	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	2.85
Total		42	.	.	.	.	.	30	3	14	0.07	111	.874	42	1.00	76	.553	3.0	5.37

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	13	2.07	27	2	.926	0.0	7.20
4	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	17	2.18	33	2	.939	0.0	6.10
9	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	15	2.65	20	0	1.000	0.0	7.71
12	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	13	2.37	19	1	.947	2.0	6.41
15	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.43	14	0	1.000	0.0	5.43
17	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	2.06	16	3	.813	0.0	5.43
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	8	1.84	32	2	.938	0.0	4.48
25	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	16	2.24	38	1	.974	0.0	4.50
26	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	2.23	26	2	.923	1.0	6.05
29	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	16	2.17	30	2	.933	0.0	2.95
46	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	1.71	24	6	.750	0.0	2.85
Total		42	.	.	.	.	.	85	2.02	136	2.15	279	21	.925	3.0	5.37