Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	8	.250	7	2	3	0.67	15	.800	27	9.00	67	.403	6.5	6.28
3	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	4	.000	5	0	2	0.00	16	.875	31	7.75	86	.360	1.0	3.32
4	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	7	2	1	0.67	15	.933	29	9.67	71	.408	3.0	4.84
6	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	5	.200	7	2	3	0.40	17	.824	44	8.80	109	.404	5.5	5.38
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	36	12.00	67	.537	0.0	5.76
9	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	3	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	32	10.67	77	.416	2.0	5.53
10	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	6	.333	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	24	8.00	77	.312	2.5	3.30
12	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	21	7.00	68	.309	1.5	2.90
13	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	3	10	-.100	6	0	1	0.00	16	.938	57	14.25	97	.588	6.0	10.00
15	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	2	1	1	0.33	12	.917	36	12.00	75	.480	3.0	6.87
17	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	7	2	2	0.50	17	.882	33	8.25	92	.359	4.5	4.27
19	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	3	5	-.600	3	2	0	0.67	9	1.000	16	5.33	64	.250	3.5	2.89
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	23	7.67	67	.343	0.5	3.06
25	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	6	.167	1	1	4	0.33	8	.500	22	7.33	55	.400	3.0	3.11
31	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	18	6.00	68	.265	1.0	1.40
34	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	3	1	0.75	22	.955	49	12.25	93	.527	3.0	7.49
39	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	9	2	2	0.50	20	.900	36	9.00	85	.424	4.0	5.58
46	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	7	1	1	0.33	14	.929	34	11.33	76	.447	3.5	7.42
Total		61	18	0.30	10	77	.104	81	19	28	0.31	227	.877	568	9.31	1394	.407	54.0	4.97

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.28
3	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.32
4	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.84
6	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.38
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	5.76
9	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.53
10	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.30
12	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.90
13	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	10.00
15	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.87
17	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.27
19	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.89
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	3.06
25	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.11
31	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.40
34	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.49
39	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.58
46	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.42
Total		61	2	30	32	4	0.52	60	0.98	.	.	.	.	.	54.0	4.97