Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	12	.167	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.64
5	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	13	.154	5	2	3	0.67	10	.700	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.38
8	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	6	19	-.053	9	1	3	0.20	18	.833	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.54
11	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	3	6	-.500	7	3	2	0.75	15	.867	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.63
14	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	15	.200	9	2	2	0.50	18	.889	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.47
15	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	20	.150	8	1	4	0.20	20	.800	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.28
23	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.42
29	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	2	13	.077	8	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.72
45	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	10	.100	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.64
Total		35	35	1.00	27	109	.073	53	10	21	0.29	124	.831	.	.	.	.	56.0	4.75

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.64
5	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.38
8	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.54
11	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.63
14	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.47
15	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.28
23	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.42
29	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.72
45	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.64
Total		35	3	16	19	1	0.54	28	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	56.0	4.75