Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	16	.188	2	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.40
6	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	23	.130	4	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.21
7	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	3	8	-.375	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	0.5	3.47
10	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	14	-.071	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.61
14	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	6	14	-.143	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.06
18	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	15	.200	6	1	1	0.25	14	.929	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.88
21	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	11	-.091	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.36
31	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	5	10	-.400	3	2	1	0.67	9	.889	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.92
36	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	22	.136	11	4	3	0.80	21	.857	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.38
41	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	23	.174	3	1	1	0.25	11	.909	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.36
46	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	20	.350	7	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.28
Total		41	50	1.22	38	176	.068	47	10	22	0.24	133	.835	.	.	.	.	74.5	5.27

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.40
6	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.21
7	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	3.47
10	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.61
14	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.06
18	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.88
21	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.36
31	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.92
36	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.38
41	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.36
46	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.28
Total		41	2	25	27	3	0.66	47	1.15	.	.	.	.	.	74.5	5.27