Players

Julian Roberts 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	13	13	14	11	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	18	.611	5	0	3	0.00	11	.727	0	0.00	1	.000	14.5	9.00
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	23	.522	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	1	0.25	1	1.000	19.0	7.10
7	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	1	23	.609	2	1	4	0.20	12	.667	0	0.00	1	.000	17.0	4.99
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	25	.360	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	0	0.00	2	.000	13.5	7.66
11	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	29	.448	12	3	3	0.75	21	.857	0	0.00	2	.000	22.5	8.95
12	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	14	.571	1	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.96
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	23	.478	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.29
15	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	17	.647	8	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.69
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	7	22	.227	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.48
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	26	.231	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	6.43
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	5	25	.440	4	2	1	0.67	11	.909	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.88
31	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	21	.429	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.08
34	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	4	27	.333	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.10
36	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	11	43	.140	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.15
39	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	9	30	.167	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.06
44	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	2	21	.571	4	1	3	0.25	13	.769	1	0.25	1	1.000	16.5	5.86
Total		54	216	4.00	64	387	.393	59	8	33	0.15	173	.809	2	0.04	9	.222	250.0	7.36

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	8	2.29	17	1	.941	14.5	9.00
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	6	1.50	13	1.86	36	5	.861	19.0	7.10
7	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	18	2.06	33	5	.848	17.0	4.99
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	10	2.40	15	1	.933	13.5	7.66
11	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	5	1.25	14	2.30	23	1	.957	22.5	8.95
12	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	15	2.32	28	1	.964	10.5	5.96
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	9	2.31	16	1	.938	16.5	8.29
15	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	7	2.29	14	0	1.000	13.0	8.69
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	16	2.21	28	2	.929	13.0	7.48
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	13	2.29	21	2	.905	11.5	6.43
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	8	2.67	6	1.78	18	3	.833	19.5	7.88
31	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	11	1.89	28	3	.893	13.5	7.08
34	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	13	2.00	25	3	.880	14.0	7.10
36	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	13	2.19	31	2	.935	19.5	8.15
39	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	10	1.96	27	3	.889	16.0	7.06
44	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	6	1.50	6	1.45	31	8	.742	16.5	5.86
Total		54	2	48	50	3	0.93	57	1.06	182	2.07	391	41	.895	250.0	7.36