Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	7.20
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	0.0	6.05
10	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	3.95
15	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.25	11	1.000	4	1.00	13	.308	1.0	7.13
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	6	0.00	13	.538	2	0.50	7	.286	0.0	6.40
29	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	3	0.00	19	.842	4	1.00	8	.500	0.0	6.93
35	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	7	.571	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	4.55
39	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	3.75
Total		27	.	.	.	.	.	21	1	17	0.04	79	.785	16	0.59	49	.327	1.0	5.75

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	6	2.00	19	0	1.000	0.0	7.20
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.36	11	1	.909	0.0	6.05
10	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.29	14	1	.929	0.0	3.95
15	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	11	2.18	22	2	.909	1.0	7.13
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	9	2.32	19	0	1.000	0.0	6.40
29	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	16	2.23	31	2	.935	0.0	6.93
35	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	13	2.04	27	4	.852	0.0	4.55
39	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	2.11	27	2	.926	0.0	3.75
Total		27	.	.	.	.	.	56	2.07	81	2.17	170	12	.929	1.0	5.75