Players

Nicholas Morgan 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	15	13	5	-

Season 8 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
146 155th	.297 203rd	22 86th	24 345th	96 3rd

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	10	.700	7	1	3	0.33	13	.769	.	.	.	.	11.5	9.74
2	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	12	.083	7	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.99
4	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	7	.714	4	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.08
6	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.01
8	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	9	3	2	1.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.68
9	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	20	.500	8	3	2	1.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	16.5	9.22
11	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	10.0	9.31
12	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	3	10	.000	5	1	6	0.20	20	.700	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.38
15	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	11	.182	6	1	2	0.25	18	.889	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.09
16	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	15	.200	2	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.29
18	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.77
19	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	11	-.091	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.38
21	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	20	.350	3	1	2	0.20	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.28
22	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	6	16	-.125	8	2	5	0.50	18	.722	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.90
25	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	6	21	.190	9	2	3	0.40	22	.864	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.40
26	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.72
30	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	11	.636	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.59
32	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.06
34	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	8	.125	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.85
35	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	10	.500	6	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.45
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	10	.500	6	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.41
40	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	12	.333	8	1	1	0.25	18	.944	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.44
44	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	6	16	-.125	3	1	3	0.25	11	.727	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.66
45	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	16	.375	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.97
Total		87	146	1.68	62	283	.297	131	22	51	0.25	345	.852	.	.	.	.	221.5	6.53

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	9.74
2	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.99
4	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.08
6	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.01
8	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.68
9	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	9.22
11	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	9.31
12	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.38
15	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.09
16	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	1	6	7	0	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.29
18	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	1	7	8	1	2.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.77
19	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.38
21	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.28
22	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.90
25	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	1	6	7	1	1.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.40
26	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.72
30	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	1	9	10	0	2.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.59
32	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.06
34	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.85
35	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.45
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.41
40	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0	1	1	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.44
44	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.66
45	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	2	5	7	1	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.97
Total		87	11	85	96	7	1.10	24	0.28	.	.	.	.	.	221.5	6.53