Players

Lincoln Bailey 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	-	15	14	7	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	11	.182	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.33
3	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	17	.176	7	3	1	0.60	20	.950	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.62
4	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	5	17	.235	7	3	3	0.60	16	.813	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.36
6	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	11	.000	10	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.03
8	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	5	21	.333	9	1	2	0.20	19	.895	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.92
9	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	12	.417	5	2	2	0.50	13	.846	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.88
10	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	1	13	.538	2	1	4	0.20	11	.636	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.10
14	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	6	20	.350	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.22
15	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	7	.429	2	0	4	0.00	10	.600	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.60
17	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	14	.429	4	2	1	0.50	14	.929	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.43
19	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	19	.368	10	3	4	0.60	22	.818	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.69
21	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	20	.650	6	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.16
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	17	.471	9	3	2	1.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	17.0	10.00
25	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	7	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.67
26	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	12	.500	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.19
30	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	15	.333	11	0	4	0.00	23	.826	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.62
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	8	.375	11	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.06
44	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	2	20	.700	3	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.45
45	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	12	.750	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.41
Total		75	171	2.28	54	277	.422	110	18	41	0.24	275	.851	.	.	.	.	223.5	6.51

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.33
3	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.62
4	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.36
6	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.03
8	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	3	2	5	1	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.92
9	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.88
10	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.10
14	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.22
15	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.60
17	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.43
19	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.69
21	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.16
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	10.00
25	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.67
26	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.19
30	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.62
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.06
44	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	2	1	3	1	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.45
45	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.41
Total		75	6	57	63	9	0.84	19	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	223.5	6.51