Players

Career Honors

S61st All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	0	0.25	12	1.000	2	0.50	4	.500	1.0	7.16
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	2	0.50	10	.200	0.0	8.53
5	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	3	0.40	17	.824	3	0.60	10	.300	2.0	8.70
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	15	.933	4	1.33	9	.444	1.0	7.21
7	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	2	0.67	12	.833	2	0.67	7	.286	2.0	4.35
8	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	1	0.25	16	.938	2	0.50	12	.167	1.0	6.33
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	3	0	1.00	18	1.000	1	0.33	3	.333	3.0	9.32
13	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	1	0.50	16	.938	5	1.25	12	.417	2.0	8.11
16	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	16	.938	5	1.00	12	.417	0.0	8.93
17	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	4.93
18	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	2	1	0.67	19	.947	4	1.33	8	.500	2.0	10.00
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	8.58
30	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	2	0.40	19	.895	3	0.60	4	.750	2.0	6.98
33	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3	1	0.75	23	.957	6	1.50	19	.316	3.0	8.29
35	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	3	0.40	16	.813	2	0.40	7	.286	2.0	6.80
38	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	15	2	2	0.50	25	.920	3	0.75	6	.500	2.0	10.00
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	3	0.67	13	.769	1	0.33	4	.250	2.0	4.22
40	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	3	0.75	9	.333	0.0	6.95
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	4	0.40	23	.826	2	0.40	7	.286	2.0	6.10
45	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	12	.917	2	0.67	2	1.000	0.0	2.85
Total		77	.	.	.	.	.	136	27	32	0.35	316	.899	55	0.71	151	.364	27.0	7.22

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	14	2.45	22	1	.955	1.0	7.16
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	24	6.00	9	2.25	16	0	1.000	0.0	8.53
5	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	12	2.48	21	0	1.000	2.0	8.70
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.38	13	0	1.000	1.0	7.21
7	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	2.27	11	0	1.000	2.0	4.35
8	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	6	1.95	19	2	.895	1.0	6.33
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	7	2.38	13	0	1.000	3.0	9.32
13	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	10	2.35	17	0	1.000	2.0	8.11
16	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	22	4.40	16	2.31	29	1	.966	0.0	8.93
17	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	7	2.46	13	0	1.000	0.0	4.93
18	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	11	2.67	15	0	1.000	2.0	10.00
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	10	2.42	19	0	1.000	0.0	8.58
30	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	15	2.36	28	2	.929	2.0	6.98
33	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	11	2.50	18	0	1.000	3.0	8.29
35	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	13	2.27	26	1	.962	2.0	6.80
38	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	15	2.62	21	0	1.000	2.0	10.00
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	2.31	13	1	.923	2.0	4.22
40	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	9	2.31	16	1	.938	0.0	6.95
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	6	2.08	12	2	.833	2.0	6.10
45	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	1.94	17	1	.941	0.0	2.85
Total		77	.	.	.	.	.	205	2.66	197	2.34	359	12	.967	27.0	7.22