Players

Chase Richardson 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	15	12	14	11	7

Season 6 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
231 61st	.317 156th	31 22nd	94 96th	54 130th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	6	36	.306	2	0	5	0.00	13	.615	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.36
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	9	36	.194	9	1	3	0.25	19	.842	1	0.25	1	1.000	18.0	7.78
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	15	.467	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.24
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	23	.217	9	1	3	0.33	19	.842	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.57
7	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	11	.364	9	2	1	0.67	18	.944	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.00
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	15	.400	10	2	1	0.67	17	.941	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	5.11
10	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	13	.615	12	3	2	1.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.31
12	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	15	.333	10	3	1	0.75	19	.947	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	4.42
13	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	17	.471	18	5	2	1.25	26	.923	2	0.50	1	2.000	18.5	7.07
16	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	2	24	.375	12	2	2	0.40	26	.923	1	0.20	1	1.000	14.0	5.42
18	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	17	.353	5	1	3	0.33	13	.769	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.95
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	17	.059	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.22
21	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	1	27	.407	4	1	4	0.20	17	.765	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.63
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	16	.438	6	1	3	0.33	14	.786	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.0	5.36
30	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	6	42	.262	7	0	5	0.00	18	.722	0	0.00	1	.000	20.0	7.47
33	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	6	31	.323	11	3	0	0.75	18	1.000	.	.	.	.	22.0	9.33
35	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	2	23	.478	12	1	0	0.20	25	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.23
38	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	10	26	.000	5	2	3	0.50	16	.813	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.64
40	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	25	.360	2	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.33
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	5	26	.346	8	2	3	0.40	21	.857	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.68
45	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	24	.292	1	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.59
Total		80	231	2.89	79	479	.317	155	31	47	0.39	359	.869	12	0.15	7	1.714	291.0	6.32

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	12	2.19	27	0	1.000	18.5	7.36
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	11	2.08	24	2	.917	18.0	7.78
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	11	2.39	18	0	1.000	12.0	7.24
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	4	1.59	17	1	.941	11.0	5.57
7	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	1	6	7	0	2.33	6	2.00	8	2.22	18	0	1.000	13.0	7.00
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	5	2.08	12	1	.917	9.0	5.11
10	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	12	2.45	20	0	1.000	12.0	7.31
12	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	2	0.50	15	2.06	31	2	.935	13.5	4.42
13	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	6	1.50	15	2.13	30	4	.867	18.5	7.07
16	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	20	2.34	32	1	.969	14.0	5.42
18	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	8	2.18	17	0	1.000	10.5	6.95
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	11	2.37	19	1	.947	7.0	4.22
21	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	13	2.13	32	2	.938	14.5	4.63
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	7	2.06	16	2	.875	9.0	5.36
30	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	6	1.20	17	2.17	35	3	.914	20.0	7.47
33	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	4	1.00	12	2.56	18	0	1.000	22.0	9.33
35	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	6	1.20	18	2.38	29	3	.897	14.5	6.23
38	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	3	0.75	18	2.22	32	2	.938	13.0	5.64
40	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	18	2.16	31	3	.903	13.5	6.33
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	20	2.26	38	4	.895	16.0	5.68
45	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	8	2.10	21	2	.905	11.5	6.59
Total		80	4	50	54	3	0.68	94	1.18	263	2.20	517	33	.936	291.0	6.32