Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	6	.667	6	0	3	0.00	12	.750	31	10.33	58	.534	6.5	7.44
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	5	0	3	0.00	10	.700	42	14.00	55	.764	4.0	10.00
4	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	3	0	3	0.00	13	.769	46	11.50	92	.500	2.5	6.46
6	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	7	1	1	0.20	20	.950	48	9.60	92	.522	3.5	5.70
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	8	0	4	0.00	14	.714	38	12.67	57	.667	3.0	9.53
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	6	.333	4	0	3	0.00	16	.813	56	11.20	102	.549	4.5	6.70
10	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	4	.750	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	34	8.50	70	.486	5.0	5.68
12	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	8	.125	6	0	2	0.00	15	.867	43	10.75	82	.524	3.0	5.74
14	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	4	.750	1	0	2	0.00	12	.833	47	11.75	84	.560	4.0	6.76
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	4	3	3	1.00	10	.700	34	11.33	58	.586	6.5	7.70
17	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	9	.222	6	1	1	0.20	15	.933	53	10.60	102	.520	7.0	6.89
18	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	10	1	1	0.33	16	.938	35	11.67	59	.593	2.0	7.47
21	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	8	.125	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	39	13.00	59	.661	2.5	8.26
22	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	6	0	1	0.00	13	.923	36	12.00	67	.537	0.0	6.86
25	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	8	.250	7	1	1	0.25	14	.929	48	12.00	75	.640	5.5	8.23
26	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	6	.333	7	0	2	0.00	16	.875	35	8.75	74	.473	4.0	5.03
30	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	8	.125	5	0	3	0.00	16	.813	49	12.25	102	.480	3.0	7.70
35	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	3	.667	8	1	6	0.25	18	.667	43	10.75	80	.538	4.0	6.76
Total		68	35	0.51	8	94	.287	100	9	43	0.13	251	.829	757	11.13	1368	.553	70.5	7.16

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.44
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	10.00
4	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.46
6	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.70
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	9.53
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.70
10	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.68
12	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.74
14	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.76
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.70
17	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.89
18	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.47
21	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.26
22	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	6.86
25	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.23
26	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.03
30	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.70
35	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.76
Total		68	3	47	50	5	0.74	86	1.26	.	.	.	.	.	70.5	7.16