Players

Micah Graham 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
10	-	12	12	9	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	10	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.37
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	8	.375	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.32
4	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	10	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.62
6	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	6	20	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.36
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	12	.083	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.00
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	16	.438	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.12
10	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	13	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.62
12	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	0	8	.750	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.84
14	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	18	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.06
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	7	-.143	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.92
17	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	8	18	-.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.88
19	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	8	-.125	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
21	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
22	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	11	-.091	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.31
25	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	0	13	.769	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.98
26	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	4	13	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.43
30	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	4	13	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.43
33	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	7	.143	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.55
44	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	19	.474	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.77
45	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.36
Total		74	116	1.57	65	238	.214	2	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	152.0	4.78

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.37
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.32
4	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.62
6	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	1	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.36
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.00
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.12
10	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.62
12	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.84
14	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.06
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.92
17	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.88
19	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
21	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
22	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.31
25	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	3	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.98
26	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.43
30	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.43
33	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.55
44	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.77
45	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.36
Total		74	1	70	71	9	0.96	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	152.0	4.78