Players

Wesley Owens 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	13	12	13	12	11

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	18	6.00	8	38	.263	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.01
4	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	4	34	.500	5	1	2	0.20	14	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	23.5	7.88
5	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	8	35	.257	7	2	3	0.40	17	.824	1	0.20	1	1.000	20.5	6.89
7	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	30	6.00	5	45	.556	2	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	34.0	8.56
8	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	9	38	.184	3	1	4	0.20	14	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	20.5	6.87
9	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	22	5.50	7	38	.395	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	24.0	9.88
10	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	20	.350	10	4	3	1.33	18	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	16.0	7.44
11	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	19	.316	4	0	3	0.00	12	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	5.15
12	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	6	18	.222	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.5	6.70
18	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	27	.222	15	4	2	1.00	25	.920	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.84
19	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	20	.100	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.31
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	6	22	.227	2	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.80
31	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	8	26	.192	4	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.29
36	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	21	4.20	3	40	.450	9	2	2	0.40	20	.900	1	0.20	1	1.000	26.5	8.38
44	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	25	.240	5	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.05
46	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	6	28	.071	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.0	4.80
Total		63	232	3.68	88	473	.304	80	15	35	0.24	223	.843	4	0.06	8	.500	274.5	6.80

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	12	2.42	19	1	.947	18.5	8.01
4	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	15	2.36	22	2	.909	23.5	7.88
5	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	9	1.80	13	2.06	33	3	.909	20.5	6.89
7	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	7	1.40	17	2.18	38	2	.947	34.0	8.56
8	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	5	1.00	19	2.27	41	2	.951	20.5	6.87
9	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	11	2.75	16	2.58	24	0	1.000	24.0	9.88
10	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	10	2.04	24	3	.875	16.0	7.44
11	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	6	1.50	15	2.17	29	2	.931	11.5	5.15
12	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	14	2.20	30	1	.967	10.5	6.70
18	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	11	2.17	23	1	.957	16.0	6.84
19	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	8	1.83	23	3	.870	5.5	2.31
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	6	2.17	12	1	.917	13.0	5.80
31	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	13	2.00	29	3	.897	14.5	6.29
36	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	5	1.00	13	2.19	26	1	.962	26.5	8.38
44	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	15	2.24	25	2	.920	11.0	7.05
46	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	9	1.83	23	5	.783	9.0	4.80
Total		63	1	53	54	0	0.86	75	1.19	206	2.17	421	32	.924	274.5	6.80