Players

Kyle Howard 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
10	14	12	15	15	2

Career Honors

S32nd All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	19	.526	10	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.41
4	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	12	.500	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	1	0.33	1	1.000	8.5	5.97
6	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	8	.250	6	1	2	0.25	14	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	4.75
7	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	10	27	-.074	8	1	2	0.20	17	.882	1	0.20	1	1.000	10.0	5.12
9	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	0	11	.818	4	1	3	0.25	12	.750	1	0.25	2	.500	11.0	4.46
10	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	6	17	.059	7	0	1	0.00	15	.933	0	0.00	6	.000	8.5	3.44
11	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	8	.250	4	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.66
14	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	1	24	.333	8	0	2	0.00	18	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	3.81
17	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	9	.778	3	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.75
19	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.0	3.78
22	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	9	.556	10	2	3	0.50	18	.833	2	0.50	1	2.000	9.5	4.68
23	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	8	.750	10	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.40
26	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.70
27	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	13	.385	3	1	3	0.33	8	.625	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.81
28	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	17	.059	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	6.5	3.42
31	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	15	.533	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.09
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	20	.450	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.68
40	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	12	.500	4	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.46
45	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	12	.333	10	5	2	1.67	16	.875	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.70
Total		68	140	2.06	45	259	.367	102	15	37	0.22	232	.841	10	0.15	15	.667	177.0	4.95

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	5	1.92	13	0	1.000	13.0	7.41
4	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	9	2.54	13	0	1.000	8.5	5.97
6	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	9	2.25	12	2.12	25	2	.920	7.5	4.75
7	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	17	2.71	21	0	1.000	10.0	5.12
9	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	5	1.94	16	2	.875	11.0	4.46
10	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	8	1.88	25	2	.920	8.5	3.44
11	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	9	2.47	15	0	1.000	5.0	4.66
14	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	9	2.14	22	1	.955	9.0	3.81
17	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	5	1.92	13	1	.923	9.0	4.75
19	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	6	2.07	15	0	1.000	7.0	3.78
22	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	11	2.75	13	2.11	28	2	.929	9.5	4.68
23	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	6	2.67	9	0	1.000	10.0	7.40
26	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	11	2.14	21	2	.905	7.0	3.70
27	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	1.75	20	4	.800	8.0	3.81
28	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	16	2.21	29	2	.931	6.5	3.42
31	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	17	2.37	30	0	1.000	11.0	7.09
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	6	1.50	17	2.30	37	1	.973	16.5	7.68
40	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	9	2.24	17	1	.941	7.5	3.46
45	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	8	2.06	16	2	.875	12.5	4.70
Total		68	1	42	43	6	0.63	85	1.25	189	2.18	385	22	.943	177.0	4.95